<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventure #22b &#8211; Spoiler-ific Review of Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podcast.indianajim.net/2009/05/08/adventure-22b-spoiler-ific-review-of-star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podcast.indianajim.net/2009/05/08/adventure-22b-spoiler-ific-review-of-star-trek/</link>
	<description>Indiana Jim, the intrepid archGEEKologist, is the answer to the cynics.  Running the gamut of geek influences, Jim discusses the latest geek headlines, interviews Sci-Fi and Fantasy authors, discusses writing, publishing and building community in the age of Social Media, random sketch comedy and moments of laugh-out-loud insanity.  Life is an adventure, and if adventure has a podcast... it must be Indiana Jim.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indiana Jim</title>
		<link>http://podcast.indianajim.net/2009/05/08/adventure-22b-spoiler-ific-review-of-star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Indiana Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcast.indianajim.net/?p=271#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment!  I&#039;ll include it in the next show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment!  I&#8217;ll include it in the next show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://podcast.indianajim.net/2009/05/08/adventure-22b-spoiler-ific-review-of-star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 05:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcast.indianajim.net/?p=271#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>Never heard your podcast before -- love it! I just followed the link from your last tweet (I&#039;m a new follower, BTW).  

An hour ago I got home from seeing Star Trek, so listening to your review was perfect timing for me.  Really enjoyed your thoughts on the casting. As for Scotty, I think you&#039;re opinion that he was brought on for some comic relief is true, but it was also true on the show.  Was Scotty ever a tragic character?  Did he ever have a truly dramatic role?  He was usually doing or saying something that had to do with either engineering or humor. In both the movie and the TV show, his engineering dialogue/acting served the plot points, and the rest of his character served for comic relief. in So, in that respect, he part in the movie wasn&#039;t far off from his part in the TV show.
I totally agree w/you on the continuity and plausibility of time travel -- they both work without much problem or argument.  And it fit neatly together without too much suspense of disbelief.

I look forward to more of your podcasts!

Oh, and if you&#039;re looking to add one more podcast to your listening schedule, you may want to check out The Scope: http://www.thescopeshow.com/  I&#039;ve been listening to them for a little over a year now, and they cover the same geeky topics as you (maybe a bit too much of the music review), and they&#039;re a funny bunch of guys. 

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard your podcast before &#8212; love it! I just followed the link from your last tweet (I&#8217;m a new follower, BTW).  </p>
<p>An hour ago I got home from seeing Star Trek, so listening to your review was perfect timing for me.  Really enjoyed your thoughts on the casting. As for Scotty, I think you&#8217;re opinion that he was brought on for some comic relief is true, but it was also true on the show.  Was Scotty ever a tragic character?  Did he ever have a truly dramatic role?  He was usually doing or saying something that had to do with either engineering or humor. In both the movie and the TV show, his engineering dialogue/acting served the plot points, and the rest of his character served for comic relief. in So, in that respect, he part in the movie wasn&#8217;t far off from his part in the TV show.<br />
I totally agree w/you on the continuity and plausibility of time travel &#8212; they both work without much problem or argument.  And it fit neatly together without too much suspense of disbelief.</p>
<p>I look forward to more of your podcasts!</p>
<p>Oh, and if you&#8217;re looking to add one more podcast to your listening schedule, you may want to check out The Scope: <a href="http://www.thescopeshow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thescopeshow.com/</a>  I&#8217;ve been listening to them for a little over a year now, and they cover the same geeky topics as you (maybe a bit too much of the music review), and they&#8217;re a funny bunch of guys. </p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

